Opel Sintra 1997 vs Chrysler Voyager 1996
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 201 HP | 156 HP | |
Torque: | 260 NM | 275 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Opel Sintra is more dynamic to drive. Opel Sintra engine produces 45 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, but torque is 15 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Thanks to more power Opel Sintra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 12.2 | |
The Opel Sintra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Sintra consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Opel Sintra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Omega | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
Opel Sintra is smaller, but slightly higher. Opel Sintra is 6 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Sintra is 2 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 460 litres | no data | |
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3765 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Sintra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Sintra has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |