Opel Sintra 1997 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Opel Sintra engine produces 15 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 73 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Opel Sintra reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 13.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 12.8 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Sintra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Sintra consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Opel Sintra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Sintra consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Sintra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Frontera | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Opel Sintra is smaller, but slightly higher. Opel Sintra is 40 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Sintra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 671 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3765 litres | 4880 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Sintra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Opel Sintra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`345 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Sintra has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |