Opel Sintra 1997 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Opel Sintra engine produces 6 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Opel Sintra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 10.4 | |
|
The Opel Sintra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Sintra consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Opel Sintra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Opel Frontera | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Opel Sintra is smaller, but slightly higher. Opel Sintra is 40 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Sintra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3765 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Sintra is 0.6 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Opel Sintra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`345 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Sintra has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |