Opel Karl 2015 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016

 
Opel Karl
2015 - 2019
Mitsubishi Space Star
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP80 HP
Torque: 96 NM106 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.9 seconds11.7 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Karl engine produces 5 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Opel Karl reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.54.1
Real fuel consumption: 5.8 l/100km5.3 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Karl consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Karl could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Karl consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star.
Fuel tank capacity: 32 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway940 km on highway
550 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 150 mm (5.9 inches)150 mm (5.9 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 3.68 m3.80 m
Width: 1.60 m1.67 m
Height: 1.48 m1.51 m
Opel Karl is smaller.
Opel Karl is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Karl is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 206 litres235 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1013 litres912 litres
Opel Karl has 29 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Karl (by 101 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.5 meters9.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Karl is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star.
Gross weight: 1`353 kg1`340 kg
Net weight:864 kg845 kg
Load capacity:489 kg495 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): no data4800
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Space Star has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv