Opel Karl 2015 vs Skoda Citigo 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 - 96 NM | 95 - 900 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 - 14.9 seconds | 13.5 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 - 4.6 | 4.1 - 4.5 | |
|
Opel Karl petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Citigo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Opel Karl is 11 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1013 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Karl has 45 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. This could mean that the Opel Karl uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`372 | ~ 1`310 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Citigo scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Citigo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Karl has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |