Opel Insignia 2013 vs Jaguar XF 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. Opel Insignia engine produces 33 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, Opel Insignia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Insignia consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Insignia could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Insignia consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1590 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Insignia) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Opel Insignia is smaller, but slightly higher. Opel Insignia is 5 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Insignia is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1675 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Insignia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Opel Insignia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`300 kg | 2`320 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Insignia has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |