Opel Grandland 2021 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Hybrid | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Opel Grandland) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Renault Kadjar), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Grandland is more dynamic to drive. Opel Grandland engine produces 84 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Opel Grandland reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.6 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 9.20 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2680 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Grandland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Opel Grandland is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1528 litres | 1478 litres | |
| Opel Grandland has 82 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Grandland (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`370 kg | 1`994 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`801 kg | 1`547 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 569 kg | 447 kg | |
| Opel Grandland load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Renault Kadjar. Therefore, Opel Grandland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Grandland has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |