Opel Grandland 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Opel Grandland and Nissan X-Trail have the same engine power, but Opel Grandland torque is 20 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Opel Grandland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Combo, Citroen Berlingo | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
| Opel Grandland is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Grandland is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 514 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1652 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Opel Grandland has 36 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 225 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Opel Grandland has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 255 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Grandland has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |