Opel Grandland 2019 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Hybrid | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Grandland is more dynamic to drive. Opel Grandland engine produces 64 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Opel Grandland reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 55 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Grandland is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1528 litres | 1478 litres | |
| Opel Grandland has 82 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Grandland (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Opel Grandland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`350 | 1`994 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Opel Grandland has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Grandland has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |