Opel Grandland 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Opel Grandland and Nissan X-Trail have the same engine power, but Opel Grandland torque is 20 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Opel Grandland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C5 Aircross | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.72 m | |
| Opel Grandland is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 9 cm wider, while the height of Opel Grandland is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 514 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1652 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Opel Grandland has 379 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 225 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Opel Grandland has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 255 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Grandland has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |