Opel Grandland 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016

 
Opel Grandland
2017 - 2018
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 120 HP120 HP
Torque: 300 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds12.4 seconds
Opel Grandland is more dynamic to drive.
Opel Grandland and Ford Kuga have the same engine power, but Opel Grandland torque is 30 NM more than Ford Kuga. Opel Grandland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.34.8
The Opel Grandland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Grandland consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Opel Grandland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1230 km in combined cycle1250 km in combined cycle
1320 km on highway1300 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.52 m
Width: 1.86 m1.84 m
Height: 1.61 m1.69 m
Opel Grandland is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Grandland is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 514 litres456 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1652 litres1603 litres
Opel Grandland has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Grandland (by 49 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Opel Grandland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`020 kg2`100 kg
Net weight:1`355 kg1`605 kg
Load capacity:665 kg495 kg
Opel Grandland load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem more than Ford Kuga. Therefore, Opel Grandland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

low
Opel Grandland has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 12 40011 800
Pros and Cons: Opel Grandland has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Ford Kuga has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv