Opel Grandland 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 159 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is a more dynamic driving. Opel Grandland engine produces 9 HP less power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Renault Kadjar. Due to the lower power, Opel Grandland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 55 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Grandland is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 514 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
|
Opel Grandland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Grandland has 42 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The Renault Kadjar may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.05 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.35 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`918 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Opel Grandland has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Grandland has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |