Opel Grandland 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Opel Grandland and Ford Kuga have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.0 | |
The Opel Grandland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Grandland consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Opel Grandland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
Opel Grandland is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Grandland is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 514 litres | 456 litres | |
Opel Grandland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Grandland has 58 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.05 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.049999999999999 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | low | |
Opel Grandland has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | 13 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Grandland has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |