Opel Grandland 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016

 
Opel Grandland
2017 - 2021
Ford Kuga
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 secondsn/a seconds
Opel Grandland and Ford Kuga have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.38.0
The Opel Grandland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Grandland consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Opel Grandland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 720 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.52 m
Width: 1.86 m1.84 m
Height: 1.61 m1.69 m
Opel Grandland is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Grandland is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 514 litres456 litres
Opel Grandland has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Opel Grandland has 58 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.05 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.049999999999999 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga.
Gross weight (kg): 1`980no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

low
Opel Grandland has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data16 200
Pros and Cons: Opel Grandland has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Ford Kuga has
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv