Opel Grandland 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Opel Grandland and Renault Kadjar have the same engine power, but Opel Grandland torque is 25 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Opel Grandland reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Grandland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Grandland consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that by driving the Opel Grandland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Grandland consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Renault Megane, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Grandland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Opel Grandland 2017 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Opel Grandland 2017 1.2 engine Renault Kadjar 2015 1.2 engine: The Renault 1.2 TCe engine (H5FT) is a four-cylinder, fully aluminum turbocharged unit equipped with a 16-valve cylinder head without hydraulic lifters. It features direct fuel injection, a timing chain drive, variable valve timing on both camshafts, ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Grandland is 3 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 514 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1652 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Opel Grandland has more luggage capacity. Opel Grandland has 42 litres more trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Grandland (by 174 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Opel Grandland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`960 kg | 1`903 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Opel Grandland has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Grandland has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |