Opel Grandland 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Opel Grandland engine produces 33 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Opel Grandland reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Grandland engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.72 m | |
| Opel Grandland is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Grandland is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 514 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1652 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Opel Grandland has 379 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 225 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Opel Grandland has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 255 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Grandland has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |