Opel Grandland 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Opel Grandland is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 200 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 12.3 seconds | 9.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 7.3 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Opel Grandland petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Opel Grandland equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
| Opel Grandland is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm wider, while the height of Opel Grandland is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 514 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1652 litres | 1982 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Opel Grandland has 36 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 330 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`062 | ~ 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Grandland has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |