Opel Grandland 2017 vs Ford Kuga 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Opel Grandland is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 200 HP | 120 - 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 400 NM | 230 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 12.3 seconds | 8.8 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 7.3 | 4.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Opel Grandland petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Opel Grandland equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
| Opel Grandland is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Grandland is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 514 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1652 litres | 1653 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 1 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Grandland is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Opel Grandland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`062 kg | ~ 2`207 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`455 kg | ~ 1`670 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 607 kg | ~ 537 kg | |
| Opel Grandland load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Ford Kuga. Therefore, Opel Grandland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Grandland has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |