Opel Frontera 1995 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Opel Frontera engine produces 13 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Opel Frontera reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.8 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.2 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Frontera consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Frontera could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Frontera consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Frontera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Omega, Opel Calibra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Frontera might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Frontera engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Opel Frontera is 34 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Frontera is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1160 litres | 670 litres | |
| Opel Frontera has 75 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Frontera (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Frontera is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Frontera has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |