Opel Frontera 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 160 HP | |
Torque: | 260 NM | 373 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Opel Frontera engine produces 45 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 113 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Opel Frontera reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.1 | |
The Opel Frontera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Frontera consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Opel Frontera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 90 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.69 m | 1.84 m | |
Opel Frontera is smaller. Opel Frontera is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Frontera is 15 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1137 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Frontera has serious deffects in 170 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Frontera has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |