Opel Frontera 1998 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 17.1 seconds | |
|
Opel Frontera is more dynamic to drive. Opel Frontera and Mitsubishi Pajero have the same engine power, but Opel Frontera torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Opel Frontera reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.4 | |
|
The Opel Frontera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Frontera consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Opel Frontera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Opel Frontera is smaller. Opel Frontera is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Frontera is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1137 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Frontera has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Frontera has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |