Opel Frontera 1998 vs Honda CR-V 1997

 
Opel Frontera
1998 - 2004
Honda CR-V
1997 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Petrol
Diesel (Opel Frontera) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda CR-V) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 115 HP128 HP
Torque: 260 NM182 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.6 seconds10.5 seconds
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Frontera engine produces 13 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 78 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Opel Frontera reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.710.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km9.6 l/100km
The Opel Frontera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Opel Frontera consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Opel Frontera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Frontera consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle570 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway670 km on highway
870 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption
Opel Frontera gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 4 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Omega, Opel SintraUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Opel Frontera engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.66 m4.53 m
Width: 1.79 m1.75 m
Height: 1.74 m1.68 m
Opel Frontera is larger.
Opel Frontera is 13 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Frontera is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 389 litres375 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1790 litres670 litres
Opel Frontera has 14 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Frontera (by 1120 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Frontera is 0.9 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Opel Frontera can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`4501`900
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

high
Average price (€): 24001400
Pros and Cons: Opel Frontera has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Honda CR-V has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv