Opel Crossland 2020 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kamiq is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 32 HP less power than Skoda Kamiq, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Skoda Kamiq. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.1 | |
|
The Skoda Kamiq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Crossland consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kamiq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Crossland could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Kamiq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1255 litres | 1395 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Kamiq. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`690 kg | 1`710 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`099 kg | 1`156 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 591 kg | 554 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |