Opel Crossland 2020 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Opel Crossland is more dynamic to drive. Opel Crossland engine produces 15 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Crossland consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Crossland consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Crossland engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.59 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Opel Crossland has 20 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 330 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |