Opel Crossland 2020 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 10 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, but torque is 10 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Opel Crossland consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Crossland consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Swift | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Suzuki Vitara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1120 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Crossland has 35 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The Suzuki Vitara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 135 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |