Opel Crossland 2020 vs Skoda Kamiq 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kamiq is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Kamiq, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.2 | |
|
The Skoda Kamiq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Crossland consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kamiq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Crossland could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Kamiq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1255 litres | 1395 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.4 metres more than that of the Skoda Kamiq. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`820 kg | 1`825 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`214 kg | 1`261 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 606 kg | 564 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Skoda Kamiq has
| |