Opel Crossland 2020 vs Peugeot 2008 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Opel Crossland engine produces 8 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 3.6 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Crossland consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Crossland could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1210 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen C4, Opel Mokka | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 434 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1255 litres | 1467 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Opel Crossland has 24 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 212 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.8 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`820 kg | 1`731 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`214 kg | 1`205 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 606 kg | 526 kg | |
| Opel Crossland load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Peugeot 2008. Therefore, Opel Crossland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |