Opel Crossland 2020 vs Nissan Juke 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Opel Crossland) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Juke) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Opel Crossland is more dynamic to drive. Opel Crossland engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Nissan Juke. Thanks to more power Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.0 | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Crossland consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Opel Crossland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Crossland engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Insignia, Citroen C4 Cactus, Citroen C3 Aircross | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 422 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1255 litres | 1305 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`855 kg | 1`725 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`286 kg | 1`211 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 569 kg | 514 kg | |
| Opel Crossland load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Nissan Juke. Therefore, Opel Crossland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |