Opel Crossland 2020 vs Hyundai Kona 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Kona is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 16 HP less power than Hyundai Kona, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Hyundai Kona. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.5 | |
| Opel Crossland consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Kona, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.55 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 361 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1255 litres | 1143 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Hyundai Kona may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 112 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.6 metres more than that of the Hyundai Kona, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`855 kg | 1`880 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`286 kg | 1`417 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 569 kg | 463 kg | |
| Opel Crossland load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Hyundai Kona. Therefore, Opel Crossland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |