Opel Crossland 2019 vs Opel Astra 2015
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Opel Crossland is more dynamic to drive. Opel Crossland engine produces 25 HP more power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Crossland consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Crossland could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Crossland consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Astra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Opel Crossland is smaller, but higher. Opel Crossland is 16 cm shorter than the Opel Astra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Crossland is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1210 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Crossland has 40 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. The Opel Astra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 45 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Astra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`835 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Opel Astra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Opel Astra has
| |