Opel Crossland 2018 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 15 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 96 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Crossland consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Crossland consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 400'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Crossland engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 2008, Citroen Berlingo | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Crossland engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Crossland is 8 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Crossland is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Crossland has 26 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 36 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |