Opel Crossland 2018 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Opel Crossland is more dynamic to drive. Opel Crossland engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Insignia, Citroen C4 Cactus, Citroen C3 Aircross | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Crossland engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Opel Crossland is smaller. Opel Crossland is 24 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Opel Crossland has 62 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 223 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`855 | 1`943 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |