Opel Crossland 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Opel Crossland engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Kadjar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.3 | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Crossland consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| Renault Kadjar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Kadjar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C4, Peugeot 3008, Citroen Berlingo, Opel Grandland | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Opel Crossland is smaller. Opel Crossland is 24 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Opel Crossland has 62 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 223 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`946 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |