Opel Crossland 2017 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 254 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 40 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 66 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Crossland consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Crossland consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Crossland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
| Opel Crossland is 1 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Crossland is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 322 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1255 litres | 1665 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Skoda Yeti may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Yeti (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 1.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`820 kg | 2`130 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`214 kg | 1`560 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 606 kg | 570 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |