Opel Crossland 2017 vs Ford EcoSport 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 254 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Opel Crossland is more dynamic to drive. Opel Crossland engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford EcoSport, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Ford EcoSport. Thanks to more power Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Crossland consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Crossland consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford EcoSport. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Crossland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Opel Crossland is 6 cm shorter than the Ford EcoSport, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Crossland is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 333 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1255 litres | 1238 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Ford EcoSport may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford EcoSport, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`820 kg | 1`760 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`214 kg | 1`372 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 606 kg | 388 kg | |
| Opel Crossland load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 36 procentiem more than Ford EcoSport. Therefore, Opel Crossland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford EcoSport has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Crossland, so Ford EcoSport quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Ford EcoSport has
| |