Opel Crossland 2017 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Opel Crossland is more dynamic to drive. Opel Crossland engine produces 20 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. Thanks to more power Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Crossland consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Crossland consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.58 m | |
| Opel Crossland is 13 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Opel Crossland is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has more luggage space. Opel Crossland has 90 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |