Opel Crossland 2017 vs Opel Grandland 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Opel Crossland engine produces 20 HP less power than Opel Grandland, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Opel Grandland. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Opel Crossland consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Grandland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Crossland could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Crossland consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Grandland. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Grandland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Opel Combo, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Grandland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Opel Crossland is smaller. Opel Crossland is 37 cm shorter than the Opel Grandland, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 514 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1652 litres | |
|
Opel Grandland has more luggage space. Opel Crossland has 104 litres less trunk space than the Opel Grandland. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Grandland (by 397 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.3 metres less than that of the Opel Grandland. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Opel Grandland has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Opel Grandland has
| |