Opel Crossland 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 51 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Opel Crossland consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Crossland consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Opel Combo, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Opel Crossland 2017 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
| Opel Crossland is 18 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Crossland is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Crossland has 26 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 36 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |