Opel Crossland 2017 vs Nissan Juke 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 33 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.0 | |
| Opel Crossland consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Crossland could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Crossland engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008 | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Crossland and Nissan Juke are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 422 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1255 litres | 1305 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`690 kg | 1`725 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`099 kg | 1`211 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 591 kg | 514 kg | |
| Opel Crossland load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Nissan Juke. Therefore, Opel Crossland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |