Opel Crossland 2017 vs Suzuki Vitara 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 36 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Opel Crossland consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Crossland consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Opel Crossland is larger, but slightly lower. Opel Crossland is 4 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1255 litres | 710 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Opel Crossland has 35 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 545 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`690 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`099 kg | 1`160 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 591 kg | 570 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Suzuki Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Suzuki Vitara, so Suzuki Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |