Opel Crossland 2017 vs Renault Captur 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 39 HP less power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 87 NM less than Renault Captur. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.5 | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Crossland consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Opel Crossland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Opel Crossland is larger. Opel Crossland is 9 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 5 cm wider, while the height of Opel Crossland is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Opel Crossland has 33 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Captur, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`727 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Renault Captur has
| |