Opel Crossland 2017 vs Peugeot 2008 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 29 HP less power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 87 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.4 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Crossland consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Crossland could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Opel Combo, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 2008 2016 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Opel Crossland is larger. Opel Crossland is 5 cm longer than the Peugeot 2008, 9 cm wider, while the height of Opel Crossland is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1255 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Opel Crossland has 60 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`690 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Peugeot 2008 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Peugeot 2008, so Peugeot 2008 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |