Opel Crossland 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Opel Crossland engine produces 36 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Opel Crossland reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Opel Crossland consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Opel Crossland over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Crossland consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
| Opel Crossland is 8 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 6 cm wider, while the height of Opel Crossland is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Crossland has 26 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 36 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |