Opel Crossland 2020 vs Nissan Juke 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Opel Crossland is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 - 130 HP | 114 - 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 300 NM | 180 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 14.5 seconds | 10.4 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 5.0 | 5.0 | |
|
Opel Crossland petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Juke. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.59 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 422 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1305 litres | |
| Opel Crossland has 12 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Juke (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`793 | ~ 1`706 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |