Opel Crossland 2020 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 83 - 130 HP | 82 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 300 NM | 118 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 14.5 seconds | 9.5 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 5.0 | 3.8 - 6.5 | |
|
Opel Crossland petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 2008. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1194 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Crossland has 50 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The Peugeot 2008 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 61 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`793 | ~ 1`653 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
| |