Opel Crossland 2020 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Opel Crossland is available only with front wheel drive, while Nissan Qashqai can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 83 - 130 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
Torque: | 118 - 300 NM | 165 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 14.5 seconds | 8.9 - 13 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 5.0 | 3.8 - 5.8 | |
Opel Crossland petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.22 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | no data | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.59 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1598 litres | |
Opel Crossland has 20 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 343 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`793 | ~ 1`953 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 16 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |