Opel Crossland 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Opel Crossland is available only with front wheel drive, while Renault Kadjar can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 - 130 HP | 110 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 300 NM | 205 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 14 seconds | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 5.3 | 3.8 - 5.6 | |
|
Opel Crossland petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Kadjar. On average, Opel Crossland equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Opel Crossland is smaller. Opel Crossland is 25 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Opel Crossland has 62 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 223 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`803 | ~ 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |