Opel Crossland 2017 vs Peugeot 2008 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel, electric) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 81 - 130 HP | 100 - 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 - 300 NM | 205 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 14 seconds | 8.2 - 11.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 5.3 | 3.6 - 6.0 | |
|
Opel Crossland petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 2008. On average, Opel Crossland equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
| Opel Crossland is 10 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Crossland is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 434 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1255 litres | 1467 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage space. Opel Crossland has 24 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 212 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Crossland is 0.8 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008, which means Opel Crossland can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`803 | ~ 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Crossland has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |