Opel Combo 2001 vs Mazda Premacy 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda Premacy is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mazda Premacy. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Combo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Combo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Combo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Combo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Meriva, Opel Corsa | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Combo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda Premacy 2001 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Opel Combo is smaller, but higher. Opel Combo is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1848 litres | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Combo has 35 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. The Mazda Premacy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`845 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |