Opel Combo 2001 vs Renault Kangoo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Opel Combo engine produces 7 HP less power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Kangoo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Opel Combo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Combo could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Opel Combo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Meriva, Opel Corsa | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kangoo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Opel Combo is larger, but slightly lower. Opel Combo is 32 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Combo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Combo has 195 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. This could mean that the Opel Combo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |