Opel Combo 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 130 NM | 178 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Opel Combo engine produces 71 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Opel Combo reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 9.2 | |
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Combo consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Opel Combo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 63 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Opel Combo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.29 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.65 m | |
Opel Combo is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Combo is 15 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
Opel Combo has more luggage capacity. Opel Combo has 25 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Combo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Opel Combo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`880 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Combo has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |